United States v. CAC-Ramsay, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Congress could have chosen to specifically exclude present and/or former government employees from bringing a qui tam action, but Congress did not.”
• court rejected government's argument that “once a present or former government employee expropriates the government's work product, the information becomes ‘disclosed’ to a member of the 'public,' because the person in the character or capacity of a private relator is a part of the public”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).