Erickson Ex Rel. United States v. American Institute of Biological Sciences

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing qui tam complaint where relator failed (i) to file the complaint in camera and (ii) to delay service on the defendant
• sensible distinctions should be drawn between cases in which “filing and service requirements can be cured and those in which they cannot”
• “Congress chose to exclude from the class of permissible qui tam relators only limited groups of persons in certain, defined circumstances”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).