Tenth Circuit· 9/24/2001

Stidham v. Peace Officer Standards & Training

Citations

265 F.3d 1144
17 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1747
2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 4758
2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 20870
2001 WL 1117059

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that state official’s ultra vires action in disseminating damaging information about the plaintiff that prevented him from obtaining employment constituted effective revocation of plaintiffs certification to work as a peace officer
holding that § 1983 plaintiff must allege and prove each defendant’s liability for the constitutional deprivation
holding that a state official’s action in disseminating damaging information about the plaintiff that prevented him from obtaining employment constituted effective revocation of plaintiff’s certification to work as a peace officer
holding that a validly enacted law places citizens on notice that violations thereof do not fall into the realm of privacy and criminal activity is thus not protected by the right to privacy
holding that a validly enacted law places citizens on notice that violations thereof do not fall into the realm of privacy and criminal activity is thus not protected by the right to privacy
noting that the “right to enjoy employment opportunities in [a] chosen field” has repeatedly been upheld as a liberty interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, McKay, Brimmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.