Skip to main content
· 5/25/1976

United States v. Joseph Pattman

Citations

  • 535 F.2d 1062
  • 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 8865

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a police report was sufficiently reliable to admit without the officer’s testimony because the report contained the probationer’s name and an accurate physical description of him
  • probation officer read from a police report which was accurate on its face as to probationer’s name and description
  • where petitioner was given actual, but not written, notice of the charges against him on the day of the preliminary hearing and written notice well in advance of the final hearing and failed to show prejudice, the error, if any, was harmless

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lay, Per Curiam, Stephenson, Webster

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.