Fifth Circuit· 1/24/2014
United States v. Brian Robinson
Citations
- 741 F.3d 588
- 2014 WL 274427
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 1493
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that harmless-error review applies to step one (procedural reasonableness) and abuse-of-discretion review to step two (substantive reasonableness)
- holding that warrant based on 24-month old information was not stale
- holding that warrant based on 24-month-old information was not stale
- emphasizing that “[sjtale information cannot be used to establish probable cause”
- emphasizing that “[s]tale information cannot be used to establish probable cause”
- collecting cases holding that digital evidence information was not stale after ten months, a year, and thirteen months
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith, Prado, Elrod
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Mark HebertFifth Circuit· 2015-12-23· cited 65×
- United States v. Daniel StanfordFifth Circuit· 2016-05-18· cited 61×
- United States v. Pedro Martinez-RomeroFifth Circuit· 2016-04-05· cited 50×
- United States v. Steve ZunigaFifth Circuit· 2017-06-14· cited 45×
- United States v. Rickey BeeneFifth Circuit· 2016-03-08· cited 40×
- United States v. Francisco Castro-AlfonsoFifth Circuit· 2016-10-27· cited 28×
- United States v. George JarmanFifth Circuit· 2017-02-01· cited 24×
- United States v. Jesse HuerraFifth Circuit· 2018-02-27· cited 18×
- United States v. Daniela Gozes-WagnerFifth Circuit· 2020-09-28· cited 18×
- United States v. Bret BroussardFifth Circuit· 2018-02-05· cited 17×
- United States v. Ignacio Arellano-BanuelosFifth Circuit· 2019-01-14· cited 16×
- United States v. FernandezFifth Circuit· 2022-09-07· cited 14×
- United States v. Arturo SarliFifth Circuit· 2019-01-16· cited 13×
- United States v. Nickdaniel ClayFifth Circuit· 2015-05-22· cited 12×
- United States v. Hugh GlennFifth Circuit· 2019-08-15· cited 12×
- United States v. Eric BeverlyFifth Circuit· 2019-11-14· cited 12×
- Doe v. United StatesS.D. Texas· 2016-06-30· cited 6×
- United States v. SadeekFifth Circuit· 2023-08-08· cited 5×
- United States v. Ignacio Arellano-BanuelosFifth Circuit· 2019-06-17· cited 4×
- United States v. PenaFifth Circuit· 2024-01-31· cited 3×
Cites
39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court· 2004-10-01· cited 23,210×
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2007-12-10· cited 20,598×
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2007-06-21· cited 7,739×
- Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2007-12-10· cited 3,379×
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-03-09· cited 1,513×
- United States v. Cisneros-GutierrezFifth Circuit· 2008-02-13· cited 1,190×
- United States v. FernandezSecond Circuit· 2006-06-01· cited 907×
- United States v. Delgado-MartinezFifth Circuit· 2009-04-06· cited 539×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scott Douglas LACY, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1997-07-10· cited 263×
- Russell Marcilis, II v. Township of RedfordSixth Circuit· 2012-09-06· cited 251×
- United States v. Ibarra-LunaFifth Circuit· 2010-12-22· cited 212×
- United States v. NealFifth Circuit· 2009-08-07· cited 210×
- United States v. Bradford Satterwhite, IIIFifth Circuit· 1992-12-17· cited 167×
- United States v. CharlesFifth Circuit· 2006-11-03· cited 161×
- United States v. Fernando FragaFifth Circuit· 2013-01-10· cited 139×
- United States v. GibbsFifth Circuit· 2005-08-16· cited 131×
- United States v. Bruce L. CraigFifth Circuit· 1988-12-13· cited 114×
- United States v. DavisFifth Circuit· 2000-08-29· cited 107×
- United States v. MaysFifth Circuit· 2006-09-29· cited 101×
- United States v. Ronald Jerome Fisher, A/K/A La Ron, and Douglas Ray Dunkins, Jr., A/K/A Little DougFifth Circuit· 1994-07-18· cited 98×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.