United States v. Ronald Jerome Fisher, A/K/A La Ron, and Douglas Ray Dunkins, Jr., A/K/A Little Doug

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the district court’s sentence because there was. “ ‘more than sufficient’ evidence” of the defendant’s guilt on the record
• “The impact of crack cocaine is devastating; Congress’ decision to punish more severely those who traffic in it is well warranted.”
• rejecting vagueness challenge to the guideline applicable to crack cocaine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).