Fifth Circuit· 3/8/2016
United States v. Rickey Beene
Citations
- 818 F.3d 157
- 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 4331
- 2016 WL 890127
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that driveway was not curtilage even though fences partially “encircled” it because it “was open,” could be observed from street, no barriers blocked access to it, and residents “took [no] steps to protect their privacy, such as posting ‘no trespassing’ signs”
- defendant’s driveway—-which was open, observable from the street, only partly fenced, and did not have indications that suggested the owners took steps to protect their privacy—was not part of the residence’s curtilage and so a dog sniff was permissible in that area
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wiener, Southwick, Graves
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. IversonSecond Circuit· 2018-07-31· cited 38×
- United States v. Andre StaggersFifth Circuit· 2020-06-09· cited 35×
- Commonwealth v. LoughnaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-11-22· cited 27×
- United States v. Lazandy DanielsFifth Circuit· 2019-07-10· cited 21×
- United States v. Howard DavisFourth Circuit· 2021-05-07· cited 19×
- United States v. James Holley, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 2016-07-27· cited 15×
- United States v. DennisFifth Circuit· 2022-07-27· cited 14×
- United States v. VelazquezSeventh Circuit· 2018-10-09· cited 9×
- James Rountree v. Joseph Lopinto, IIIFifth Circuit· 2020-10-02· cited 7×
- State v. ChuteSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2018-03-14· cited 7×
- United States v. MontemayorFifth Circuit· 2022-12-19· cited 6×
- Schmidt v. StassiE.D. Louisiana· 2017-04-21· cited 5×
- United States v. MaberryS.D. Mississippi· 2016-06-21· cited 2×
- United States v. Ferrer-MartellD. Puerto Rico· 2016-10-25· cited 1×
- United States v. BeeneW.D. Louisiana· 2016-09-26
- Commonwealth v. WitteyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2023-06-05
- Sauceda v. LopezFifth Circuit· 2025-01-08
Cites
67 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
- United States v. RossSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,985×
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1886-02-01· cited 3,820×
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court· 1967-06-05· cited 3,591×
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court· 1983-06-20· cited 3,374×
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court· 1984-04-02· cited 3,218×
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court· 2009-04-21· cited 2,725×
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 2,560×
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-03-24· cited 2,470×
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court· 1985-01-15· cited 2,391×
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-04-21· cited 2,033×
- Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court· 2005-01-24· cited 2,007×
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1984-04-17· cited 1,923×
- Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2001-06-11· cited 1,834×
- Florida v. JardinesSupreme Court· 2013-03-26· cited 1,615×
- Arizona v. HicksSupreme Court· 1987-03-03· cited 1,525×
- Kentucky v. KingSupreme Court· 2011-05-16· cited 1,457×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.