Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 3/8/2016

United States v. Rickey Beene

Citations

  • 818 F.3d 157
  • 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 4331
  • 2016 WL 890127

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that driveway was not curtilage even though fences partially “encircled” it because it “was open,” could be observed from street, no barriers blocked access to it, and residents “took [no] steps to protect their privacy, such as posting ‘no trespassing’ signs”
  • defendant’s driveway—-which was open, observable from the street, only partly fenced, and did not have indications that suggested the owners took steps to protect their privacy—was not part of the residence’s curtilage and so a dog sniff was permissible in that area

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wiener, Southwick, Graves

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

67 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.