United States v. Ulysses Biggins, A/K/A Jake Frazier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[The district court’s] discretion is not to be sacrificed to a formalistic adherence to the standard we establish.”
• The trial court’s “discretion to admit the evidence is not to be sacrificed to a formalistic adherence to the standard we establish.”
• \[The district court's] discretion is not to be sacrificed to a formalistic adherence to the standard we establish.\
• pursuant to Fed R. Evid. 901(b)(5), a witness’s familiarity with the voice sought to be identified is sufficient to ensure reliable voice identification
• sale of cocaine similar to allegation of possession and distribution of heroin

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).