United States v. Billy M. Townsend

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that one officer’s personal observations and the collective knowledge doctrine are sufficient to justify an investigatory stop

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Scotty Lee Hudson
  Sixth Circuit· 2005-04-22· cited 133×
• State v. Bulington
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2004-01-29· cited 80×
• State v. Carlson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-12-01· cited 4×
• United States v. Hudson
  Sixth Circuit· 2005-04-22

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Cortez
  Supreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 5,975×
• United States v. Sokolow
  Supreme Court· 1989-04-03· cited 4,647×
• Illinois v. Wardlow
  Supreme Court· 2000-01-19· cited 4,162×
• United States v. Hensley
  Supreme Court· 1985-01-08· cited 2,340×
• Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State Penitentiary
  Supreme Court· 1971-03-29· cited 1,845×
• United States v. Scottie Ray Hurst
  Sixth Circuit· 2000-09-22· cited 288×
• United States v. Albert Thomas (92-4344) and Angelique Dupree (93-3026)
  Sixth Circuit· 1993-12-14· cited 209×
• James E. McCurdy v. Montgomery County, Ohio
  Sixth Circuit· 2001-02-16· cited 136×
• United States v. Thomas J. Hensley
  Sixth Circuit· 1983-08-09· cited 12×