Second Circuit· 10/15/1974
United States v. Bernhard Fein
Citations
- 504 F.2d 1170
- 1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 6497
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “an indictment returned by a grand jury sitting beyond its legally authorized time is a nullity” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mulligan, Winter, Newman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. George StofskySecond Circuit· 1975-11-07· cited 170×
- United States v. Joseph R. PisaniSecond Circuit· 1985-09-12· cited 136×
- United States v. Hon. Judge Almeric L. ChristianThird Circuit· 1981-09-30· cited 110×
- United States v. Thomas J. KoliboskiSeventh Circuit· 1984-04-24· cited 78×
- United States v. Lance Henry Wilson, United States of America v. Leonard E. Briscoe, Sr., United States of America v. Maurice David SteierD.C. Circuit· 1994-10-19· cited 74×
- Robert Hawthorne, Inc. v. Director of Internal RevenueE.D. Pennsylvania· 1976-03-03· cited 67×
- United States v. Daniel MacKlinSecond Circuit· 1975-09-04· cited 43×
- United States v. GillespieN.D. Illinois· 1987-07-29· cited 24×
- United States v. TaylorSeventh Circuit· 1988-02-17· cited 24×
- United States v. Armored Transport, Inc., Appellant-DefendantNinth Circuit· 1980-10-07· cited 23×
- United States v. MarrapeseD. Rhode Island· 1985-06-11· cited 20×
- In Re Inv. Grand Jury of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-05-30· cited 19×
- United States v. Paul Skulsky, and Marc Pozner, Appeal of Paul Skulsky, in No. 85-5123. Appeal of Marc Pozner, in No. 85-5124Third Circuit· 1986-03-13· cited 15×
- Steinbeck v. Iowa District Court Ex Rel. Linn CountySupreme Court of Iowa· 1974-12-18· cited 15×
- Walter Wax and Lawrence Levine v. Honorable Constance Baker Motley, United States District Judge, United States of America v. Norman RubinsonSecond Circuit· 1975-01-21· cited 13×
- United States v. Daniel MacKlinSecond Circuit· 1976-05-03· cited 11×
- United States v. ChiarizioD. Connecticut· 1975-01-21· cited 8×
- United States v. LytleN.D. Illinois· 1987-04-15· cited 6×
- United States v. MitchellDistrict of Columbia· 1975-02-14· cited 5×
- United States v. Roy R. Carver, Joseph C. Lemire, Lionel W. Achuck, Jon T. Stephens, Interconex, IncD.C. Circuit· 1982-02-12· cited 4×
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court· 1943-05-03· cited 999×
- United States v. Borden Co.Supreme Court· 1939-12-04· cited 757×
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1943-10-11· cited 559×
- Bronson v. SchultenSupreme Court· 1882-01-18· cited 340×
- In Re MillsSupreme Court· 1890-04-28· cited 130×
- United States v. GaleSupreme Court· 1883-10-23· cited 123×
- Atlas v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court· 1963-04-29· cited 104×
- United States v. PerlsteinThird Circuit· 1942-02-20· cited 83×
- United States v. ParkerThird Circuit· 1939-04-11· cited 63×
- Beatrice Foods Co. v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1963-01-02· cited 53×
- Stillman v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1949-10-27· cited 44×
- Young v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1954-06-07· cited 39×
- Nolan v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1947-10-14· cited 39×
- United States v. JohnsonSeventh Circuit· 1941-09-15· cited 37×
- Speck v. Lavino Shipping Co.Supreme Court· 1939-05-29· cited 37×
- Malone v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 1938-01-06· cited 36×
- Huggins v. ToomerSupreme Court· 1948-06-14· cited 27×
- Romney v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1948-03-22· cited 19×
- United States v. RockefellerS.D. New York· 1914-12-15· cited 14×
- Elwell v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 1921-01-11· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.