United States v. Paul Skulsky, and Marc Pozner, Appeal of Paul Skulsky, in No. 85-5123. Appeal of Marc Pozner, in No. 85-5124

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying abuse of discretion standard of review when considering whether district court erred “in limiting the scope of [an] evidentiary hearing”
• applying the abuse of discretion standard for limiting the scope of an evidentiary hearing
• affirming the denial of evidentiary hearing on issue of ex parte communications because the record clearly indicated that the ex parte communication concerned “the procedural question of [the appropriate] forum” and, thus, could not have been prejudicial to the defendants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).