United States v. Denedo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a court with no role in the underlying proceedings could not hear a coram nobis petition
• recognizing that the rule that Congress defines the subject-matter jurisdiction of federal courts “applies with added force to Article I tribunals . . . .”
• recognizing that the rule that Congress defines the subject-matter jurisdiction of federal courts “applies with added force to Article I tribunals . . . .”
• recognizing that the rule that Congress defines the subject-matter jurisdiction of federal courts “applies with added force to Article I tribunals . . . .”
• recognizing that the rule that Congress defines the subject-matter jurisdic- tion of federal courts “applies with added force to Article I tribunals”
• admonishing that coram nobis relief should be cabined “so that finality is not a risk in a great number of cases”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).