Second Circuit· 8/27/2012
United States v. Beardsley
Citations
- 691 F.3d 252
- 2012 WL 3641933
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the modified categori- cal approach applies only to divisible statutes
- holding that the modified categorical approach applies only to divisible statutes
- holding that the modified categori- cal approach applies only to divisible statutes
- holding that the modified categorical approach applies only to divisible statutes
- identifying in a hypothetical situation that “statutory rape [is] an offense unquestionably relating to the sexual abuse of a minor”
- noting that “the statute does create two offenses”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman, Straub, Lynch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2013-06-20· cited 2,997×
- Michael Allen v. Richard IvesNinth Circuit· 2020-02-24· cited 61×
- United States v. CarterFirst Circuit· 2014-04-30· cited 43×
- Florez v. HolderSecond Circuit· 2015-03-04· cited 37×
- Obeya v. SessionsSecond Circuit· 2018-03-08· cited 33×
- United States v. BarkerSecond Circuit· 2013-07-09· cited 32×
- United States v. WalkerSecond Circuit· 2020-09-11· cited 31×
- United States v. MartinezSecond Circuit· 2021-03-16· cited 26×
- United States v. GenaoSecond Circuit· 2017-08-28· cited 25×
- United States v. LottSecond Circuit· 2014-04-24· cited 24×
- Efstathiadis v. HolderSecond Circuit· 2014-05-20· cited 24×
- United States v. MorenoSecond Circuit· 2016-02-22· cited 20×
- United States v. LockhartSecond Circuit· 2014-05-15· cited 18×
- United States v. BordeauxSecond Circuit· 2018-03-27· cited 17×
- United States v. SimardSecond Circuit· 2013-09-10· cited 13×
- United States v. MaldonadoSecond Circuit· 2014-09-18· cited 13×
- Campbell v. HolderFirst Circuit· 2012-10-19· cited 10×
- United States v. AllenSecond Circuit· 2014-04-16· cited 8×
- United States v. Dwayne MorganFifth Circuit· 2017-01-12· cited 6×
- United States v. BroxmeyerSecond Circuit· 2013-02-05· cited 5×
Cites
45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 5,461×
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2005-03-07· cited 4,574×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2010-03-02· cited 1,738×
- Begay v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2008-04-16· cited 1,437×
- James v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2007-04-18· cited 1,145×
- Nijhawan v. HolderSupreme Court· 2009-06-15· cited 738×
- Chambers v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2009-01-13· cited 627×
- United States v. Aguila-Montes De OcaNinth Circuit· 2011-08-11· cited 187×
- United States v. WoodsSeventh Circuit· 2009-08-05· cited 183×
- United States v. Palomino GarciaEleventh Circuit· 2010-05-21· cited 168×
- United States v. SavageSecond Circuit· 2008-09-18· cited 130×
- Jean-Louis v. Attorney General of the United StatesThird Circuit· 2009-10-06· cited 124×
- Hoodho v. HolderSecond Circuit· 2009-02-06· cited 121×
- John P. Dickson v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States of AmericaSecond Circuit· 2003-09-09· cited 108×
- United States v. RiversFourth Circuit· 2010-02-25· cited 101×
- United States v. David FergusonSixth Circuit· 2012-06-05· cited 96×
- Wala v. MukaseySecond Circuit· 2007-12-12· cited 96×
- United States v. Zuniga-SotoTenth Circuit· 2008-06-03· cited 95×
- United States v. Gonzalez-TerrazasFifth Circuit· 2008-05-22· cited 77×
- United States v. GiggeyFirst Circuit· 2008-12-22· cited 76×
Other cases named United States v. Beardsley
5 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- United States v. BeardsleyU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review· 1982-03-26· cited 1×
- United States v. BeardsleyThird Circuit· 1977-05-10
- United States v. BeardsleyThird Circuit· 1978-10-02
- United States v. BeardsleyEighth Circuit· 1984-03-19
- United States v. BeardsleyEleventh Circuit· 1994-04-20
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.