· 9/10/2013
United States v. Simard
Citations
- 731 F.3d 156
- 2013 WL 4792509
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 18818
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying the categorical approach in interpreting § 2252(b)(2) and clarifying that the modified categorical approach would have been appropriate with a divisible statute
- applying the categorical approach in interpreting § 2252(b)(2) and clarifying that the modified categorical approach would have been appropriate with a divisible statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Calabresi, Cabranes, Sack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.