Skip to main content
· 9/10/2013

United States v. Simard

Citations

  • 731 F.3d 156
  • 2013 WL 4792509
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 18818

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the categorical approach in interpreting § 2252(b)(2) and clarifying that the modified categorical approach would have been appropriate with a divisible statute
  • applying the categorical approach in interpreting § 2252(b)(2) and clarifying that the modified categorical approach would have been appropriate with a divisible statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Calabresi, Cabranes, Sack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.