United States v. Barrero

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “district court was plainly correct when it decided that it did not have the discretion to award [appellant] only one point under the Guidelines once it had determined, by the process provided by the Guidelines, that [appellant] had two such points”
• holding there is “no constitutional bar to a legislative instruction to a judge to sentence the defendant to such a mandatory minimum where, as here, the defendant is ineligible for safety valve relief based on the court’s finding that he had more than one criminal history point”
• holding there is “no constitutional bar to a legislative instruction to a judge to sentence the defendant to such a mandatory minimum where, as here, the defendant is ineligible for safety valve relief based on the court’s finding that he had more than one crimi- nal history point”
• rejecting appellant's argument that 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f)(1) is rendered advisory by Booker

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named United States v. Barrero

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• United States v. Barrero
  Second Circuit· 2005-09-27· cited 9×
• United States v. Barrero
  Eleventh Circuit· 1994-03-25