United States v. Boris Selioutsky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that abuse of discretion is the appropriate standard for reviewing, as an element of reasonableness review, whether a departure is permissible under the Guidelines
• holding that abuse of discretion is the appropriate standard for reviewing, as an element of reasonableness review, whether a departure is permissible under the Guidelines
• treating the question of whether a departure is permissible under the Guidelines as simply one element of the general reasonableness review mandated by Booker
• treating the question of whether a departure is permissible under the Guidelines as simply one element of the general reasonableness review mandated by Booker
• “An error in determining the applicable Guideline range or the availability of departure authority would be the type of procedural error that could render a sentence unreasonable under Booker.”
• “An error in determining the applicable Guideline range or the availability of departure authority would be the type of procedural error that could ren- der a sentence unreasonable under Booker.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).