Skip to main content
· 6/23/1994

United States v. Ashfaq Mohammed

Citations

  • 27 F.3d 815
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15777
  • 1994 WL 278350

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[i]t is clear that a violation of section 2119, the carjacking statute, is a crime of violence within the meaning of section 924(c)”
  • eschewing Blockburger test when congressional intent “plain from the language of” statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feinberg, Pratt, Miner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.