United States v. Desena

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court’s denial of motion to downwardly depart under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3 is not appealable where there was “no indication that [the district court] mistakenly believed [that it] lacked the authority to depart as a matter of law”
• holding that district court’s denial of motion to downwardly depart under 14 U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3 is not appealable where there was “no indication that [the district 15 court] mistakenly believed [that it] lacked the authority to depart as a matter of 16 law.”
• finding “casual storytelling in a bar, more than two years after the event,” was “idle chatter” that was not in furtherance of the conspiracy
• dismissing for want of jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).