Second Circuit· 1/11/1973
United States v. Arthur Needles
Citations
- 472 F.2d 652
- 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 12205
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[S]ince sentences should not be based upon misinformation ... in some circumstances the probation office or prosecution should be requested to provide substantiation of challenged information submitted to the judge”
- a dropped count in an indictment may be considered
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lumbard, Feinberg, Mansfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
74 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. RigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-08-17· cited 471×
- United States v. Manuel Concepcion, Roberto Aponte, and Nelson FriasSecond Circuit· 1993-03-25· cited 425×
- United States v. BarkerD.C. Circuit· 1975-02-25· cited 279×
- United States v. Carmine Fatico, and Daniel FaticoSecond Circuit· 1978-06-12· cited 249×
- United States v. Daniel FaticoSecond Circuit· 1979-08-13· cited 214×
- United States v. Gregory Angelo SpencerSixth Circuit· 1987-12-31· cited 176×
- Mayes v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1992-01-31· cited 158×
- United States v. Edmund RosnerSecond Circuit· 1973-09-26· cited 156×
- United States v. Vito Lorusso and Joseph ErranteSecond Circuit· 1982-12-02· cited 122×
- Billiteri v. United States Board of ParoleSecond Circuit· 1976-08-30· cited 111×
- United States v. Charmer Industries, Inc., and Peerless Importers, Inc.Second Circuit· 1983-06-28· cited 110×
- Virgil F. Ryder v. Terry Morris, Superintendent, Moberly Training Center for MenEighth Circuit· 1985-02-07· cited 92×
- State v. HueySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-03-11· cited 86×
- United States v. FaticoE.D. New York· 1978-07-27· cited 83×
- United States v. Walter Deland TriplettSixth Circuit· 1987-09-21· cited 80×
- United States v. Lawrence Victor Miller, A/K/A Larry MillerNinth Circuit· 1979-01-03· cited 73×
- United States v. Giuseppe Pugliese and Pietro PuglieseSecond Circuit· 1986-11-21· cited 73×
- United States v. Robert MichaelsonSecond Circuit· 1977-03-31· cited 72×
- United States v. James Bass, Jr.D.C. Circuit· 1976-04-23· cited 59×
- Osborn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1983-10-28· cited 59×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 5,257×
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-04-02· cited 3,200×
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1949-06-06· cited 2,766×
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court· 1972-01-11· cited 2,508×
- Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court· 1948-06-14· cited 1,667×
- Williams v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1959-03-30· cited 452×
- United States v. John Christopher DoyleSecond Circuit· 1965-10-11· cited 288×
- United States v. Janice Weston, A/K/A Janice WallaceNinth Circuit· 1971-09-03· cited 229×
- United States v. Gary MalcolmSecond Circuit· 1970-09-23· cited 169×
- United States v. Martin SweigSecond Circuit· 1972-01-12· cited 142×
- The United States of America v. Emanuel LesterSecond Circuit· 1957-08-12· cited 97×
- United States v. William Grayson FischerSecond Circuit· 1967-07-24· cited 61×
- United States v. Wesley Clyde BrownSecond Circuit· 1972-12-06· cited 57×
- United States v. Victor Domenic CifarelliSecond Circuit· 1968-12-09· cited 56×
- United States v. Paul M. HughesSecond Circuit· 1964-01-09· cited 51×
- United States v. Norstrand CorporationSecond Circuit· 1948-05-26· cited 42×
- United States of America Ex Rel. Fred Lafay v. Hon. Harry Fritz, Superintendent of Auburn Correctional Facility, Auburn, New YorkSecond Circuit· 1972-01-26· cited 34×
- United States v. Billie A. BryantD.C. Circuit· 1971-02-04· cited 22×
- United States v. Joseph HolderSecond Circuit· 1969-06-24· cited 21×
- United States v. Jack John VirgaSecond Circuit· 1970-05-18· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.