· 1/11/1973
United States v. Arthur Needles
Citations
- 472 F.2d 652
- 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 12205
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[S]ince sentences should not be based upon misinformation ... in some circumstances the probation office or prosecution should be requested to provide substantiation of challenged information submitted to the judge”
- a dropped count in an indictment may be considered
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lumbard, Feinberg, Mansfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.