Skip to main content
· 4/23/1976

United States v. James Bass, Jr.

Citations

  • 535 F.2d 110
  • 175 U.S. App. D.C. 282
  • 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 11649

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • evidence of defendant’s “high life style” while unemployed held impermissible because jury might infer previous criminal activity
  • “In monitoring the sentencing process, appellate courts have shown particular concern over sentences imposed on the basis of information which is materially false.”
  • “[T]his appellant did not dispute the truthfulness of the allegations at sentencing. . . . We see no reason to bar sentencing judges from considering relevant information whose accuracy is not disputed.”
  • “If a denial [by a defendant] were to be made, the ... court might request the Government to submit some verification ... [or] find existing factual support or indicia of reliability for the allegations ...”
  • absence of denial itself provides important indicium of reliability

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bazelon, Robinson, MacKinnon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.