United States v. Arthur James Walker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that conspirators are deemed to continue as members of conspiracy absent affirmative evidence of termination of or withdrawal from conspiracy
• noting that conspir- ators are deemed to continue as members of conspiracy absent affir- mative evidence of termination of or withdrawal from conspiracy
• to establish withdrawal from a conspiracy, a defendant must show affirmative acts inconsistent with the object of the conspiracy and communicated in a manner reasonably calculated to reach his coconspirators
• to establish withdrawal from a conspiracy, a defendant must show affirmative acts inconsistent with the object of the conspiracy and communicated in a manner reasonably calculated to reach his co- conspirators
• the burden of proving withdrawal rests on the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).