· 5/2/1983
United States v. Joseph George Helmich
Citations
- 704 F.2d 547
- 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28369
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting argument that prosecution was barred by the statute of limitation because “the indictment on its face [did not] show[ ] that the limitations period had expired”
- conspiracy to transfer secret information lasted seventeen years after last act of transfer, until final payment was made
- defendant who pleads guilty can challenge their prosecution as time barred only insofar as the indictment on its face shows that the limitations period expired
- discretion of prosecutor in deciding whether and how to prosecute is absolute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Roney, Clark, Gibson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.