Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 6/28/2001

United States v. Arlt

Citations

  • 15 F. App'x 431

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • district court did not err in denying disqualification of 16 magistrate judge, because “disagreement with the magistrate judge's rulings does not provide a 17 basis for recusal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berzon, Noonan, Trott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Arlt

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.