United States v. Fabio Jaramillo-Suarez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the district court's failure to inform the defendant he could face a maximum of twenty years in prison was not harmless error, even though he was sentenced to the mandatory minimum, of which he was made aware
• \ '[T]he dictates of Rule 11 and the federal policy of fair and efficient judicial administration require that the reviewing court look solely to the record of the plea proceeding.' \ (citation omitted)
• defendant's attorney's reference to maximum sentence at plea hearing does not render harmless district court's failure to advise defendant of the maximum sentence
• “ ‘[T]he dictates of Rule 11 and the federal policy of fair and efficient judicial administration require that the reviewing court look solely to the record of the plea proceeding.’ ” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).