Second Circuit· 1/29/2024

United States v. Aquart

Citations

92 F.4th 77

Oral argument

Argued
34 min recording
Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that an appeals court departs from the law of the case doctrine “sparingly and only when presented with cogent and compelling 19 No. 22-558-cv reasons” (internal quotation marks omitted)
stating the law of the case “will be disregarded only when the court has a clear conviction of error with respect to a point of law on which its previous decision was predicated”
“[T]his court generally has been reluctant to find a speedy trial violation in the absence of genuine prejudice.” (cleaned up)
“[T]he reasonable time required to . . . respond to, and resolve [pretrial] motions is 9 valid delay not raising speedy trial concerns.”
“Davis sheds little light on whether the categorical approach might apply to [the defendant]’s VICAR murder counts of conviction.”
\[A] contrary construction of the . . . rule would effectively eviscerate it by creating an incentive for parties to hold ripe arguments in reserve.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

73 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.