Supreme Court· 3/9/2009
Vermont v. Brillon
Citations
- 556 U.S. 81
- 129 S. Ct. 1283
- 173 L. Ed. 2d 231
- 2009 U.S. LEXIS 1780
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “assigned counsel’s failure to move the case forward does not warrant attribution of delay to the state” for purposes of speedy trial claim
- noting that a publicly assigned or privately retained counsel for a criminal defendant is not ordinarily considered a state actor
- stating “a court should consider whether some of the delay is attributable to the defendant”
- to whom delays may be charged, the defendant or the state, for purposes of speedy trial considerations
- “Unlike a prosecutor or the court, assigned counsel ordinarily is not considered a state actor.”
- “Unlike a prosecutor or the court, assigned counsel ordinarily is not considered a state actor.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ginsburg, Breyer, Stevens
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
242 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. OsborneSupreme Court· 2009-06-18· cited 782×
- Balderas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2016-11-02· cited 297×
- State v. GarzaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2009-06-25· cited 277×
- People v. LomaxCalifornia Supreme Court· 2010-07-01· cited 249×
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court· 2013-12-19· cited 224×
- State v. SamoraNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2016-08-08· cited 139×
- State v. IniguezWashington Supreme Court· 2009-10-08· cited 139×
- State v. OllivierWashington Supreme Court· 2013-10-31· cited 132×
- State v. RafayCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-06-18· cited 125×
- State of Arizona v. Steven John ParkerArizona Supreme Court· 2013-03-13· cited 110×
- United States v. AshbyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2009-08-31· cited 97×
- United States v. DowdellFirst Circuit· 2010-02-12· cited 92×
- State v. SerrosNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2015-11-12· cited 92×
- Hopper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2017-06-07· cited 86×
- United States v. GhailaniSecond Circuit· 2013-10-24· cited 83×
- United States v. BattisThird Circuit· 2009-12-14· cited 83×
- Sosniak v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2012-11-19· cited 77×
- State of Minnesota v. Kemen Lavatos Taylor, IISupreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-08-26· cited 70×
- Byron Nelson Griggs v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2016-02-02· cited 67×
- State of Missouri v. Sylvester R. Sisco IISupreme Court of Missouri· 2015-03-10· cited 63×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 12,560×
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
- Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court· 1981-12-14· cited 4,924×
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-06-24· cited 3,106×
- Oregon v. HassSupreme Court· 1975-03-19· cited 1,364×
- United States v. Loud HawkSupreme Court· 1986-03-03· cited 786×
- State v. BrillonSupreme Court of Vermont· 2008-03-14· cited 69×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.