Seventh Circuit· 10/28/2013
United States v. Anthony Lyons
Citations
- 733 F.3d 777
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 21982
- 2013 WL 5778958
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a driver’s recent attempt to flee was a factor to consider when determining the constitutionality of a frisk of the passenger who had decided “to associate himself” with the driver
- vacating the sentence when the record gave “no indication of how the district court weighed the various sentencing factors”
- vacating the sentence when the record gave “no indication of how the district court weighed the various sentencing factors”
- “A sentencing court commits procedural error by not adequately explaining its choice of sentence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Posner, Tinder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Tommy AdamsSeventh Circuit· 2014-02-26· cited 102×
- United States v. RiveraSeventh Circuit· 2017-02-03· cited 52×
- United States v. Lloyd B. LockwoodSeventh Circuit· 2016-11-01· cited 39×
- United States v. Amono WashingtonSeventh Circuit· 2014-01-17· cited 32×
- Michael Seiser v. City of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 2014-08-12· cited 32×
- United States v. Tony CurrieSeventh Circuit· 2014-01-07· cited 27×
- United States v. Lloyd LockwoodSeventh Circuit· 2015-06-16· cited 25×
- United States v. Carl MooseSeventh Circuit· 2018-06-27· cited 23×
- United States v. DachmanSeventh Circuit· 2014-02-18· cited 23×
- United States v. Joseph WilcherSeventh Circuit· 2024-01-25· cited 18×
- United States v. Charles Pollock, Jr.Seventh Circuit· 2014-07-01· cited 17×
- United States v. Christopher BainesSeventh Circuit· 2015-02-09· cited 15×
- United States v. Anthony MorganSeventh Circuit· 2021-02-03· cited 14×
- United States v. Norman BreedloveSeventh Circuit· 2014-06-30· cited 12×
- United States v. FordSeventh Circuit· 2017-09-20· cited 11×
- United States v. Ronald ColbertSeventh Circuit· 2022-11-29· cited 7×
- United States v. Gary DebenedettoSeventh Circuit· 2014-04-04· cited 4×
- United States v. Brandon ShoffnerSeventh Circuit· 2019-11-08· cited 4×
- United States v. Derrick DavisSeventh Circuit· 2022-08-04· cited 3×
- United States v. Gary DebenedettoSeventh Circuit· 2014-03-03· cited 2×
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2007-12-10· cited 20,598×
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-03-24· cited 12,622×
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2007-06-21· cited 7,739×
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 4,326×
- Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 2,082×
- Arizona v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 2009-01-26· cited 1,709×
- Maryland v. PringleSupreme Court· 2003-12-15· cited 1,610×
- Maryland v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1997-02-19· cited 1,555×
- United States v. Di ReSupreme Court· 1948-01-19· cited 1,525×
- Wyoming v. HoughtonSupreme Court· 1999-04-05· cited 987×
- United States v. Karl CunninghamSeventh Circuit· 2005-11-14· cited 550×
- United States v. Christopher DuguaySeventh Circuit· 1996-10-31· cited 184×
- United States v. JacksonSeventh Circuit· 2008-10-29· cited 155×
- United States v. SblendorioSeventh Circuit· 1987-09-08· cited 142×
- United States v. Kenneth R. LenoirSeventh Circuit· 2003-02-26· cited 112×
- United States v. Carlos Rodriguez-AlvarezSeventh Circuit· 2005-10-12· cited 77×
- United States v. Andre WilliamsSeventh Circuit· 2013-09-24· cited 72×
- United States v. GarySeventh Circuit· 2010-07-28· cited 65×
- United States v. HarrisSeventh Circuit· 2009-06-02· cited 60×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.