United States v. Kenneth R. Lenoir

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when police officers are in communication regarding a suspect, “the knowledge of one officer can be imputed to No. 08-1259 7 the other officers under the collective knowledge doc- trine”
• holding that hot pursuit of a fleeing suspect justified a warrantless entry into the suspect’s home to protect inhabitants as long as the police did not know the home belonged to the suspect
• stating that “warrantless searches will be allowed when police have a reasonable belief that exigent circumstances require immediate action and there is no time to secure a warrant”
• stating that “warrantless searches will be allowed when police have a reasonable belief that exigent circumstances require immediate action and there is no time to secure a war- rant”
• “Carrying . . . weapons may not be a crime in Indiana, but the police can still factor this otherwise innocent behavior into the [reasonable suspicion] equation.”
• officer reasonably suspected individual was violating Indiana’s public intoxication statute after observing suspect’s irregular gait

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).