· 6/30/2014
United States v. Norman Breedlove
Citations
- 756 F.3d 1036
- 2014 WL 2925284
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 12470
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining contingent obligations do not preclude “executoriness” because contingent obligations are “continuing dut[ies] to stand ready to perform” should the contingency occur
- “the maximum statutory penalty reflects at least some measure of legislative judgment regarding the seriousness of a crime”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cudahy, Easterbrook, Lawrence
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.