Skip to main content
· 6/30/2014

United States v. Norman Breedlove

Citations

  • 756 F.3d 1036
  • 2014 WL 2925284
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 12470

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining contingent obligations do not preclude “executoriness” because contingent obligations are “continuing dut[ies] to stand ready to perform” should the contingency occur
  • “the maximum statutory penalty reflects at least some measure of legislative judgment regarding the seriousness of a crime”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Easterbrook, Lawrence

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.