Skip to main content
· 9/19/2013

United States v. Anthony Elonis

Citations

  • 730 F.3d 321
  • 42 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1409
  • 2013 WL 5273118
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 19316

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to interpret Black as “invalidating] the objective intent standard the majority of circuits appl[y] to true threats” because the Virginia statute “already required a subjective intent to intimidate”
  • “[W]e find that Black does not alter our precedent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scirica, Hardiman, Aldisert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.