Porter v. Ascension Parish School Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Tinker “applies to school regulations directed at DARIANO V. MORGAN HILL UNIFIED SCH. DIST. 33 specific student viewpoints”
• explaining that \[s]peech is a true threat and therefore unprotected if an objectively reasonable person would interpret the speech as a serious expression of an intent to cause a present or future harm\
• explaining that “[s]peech is a true threat and therefore unprotected if an objectively reasonable person would interpret the speech as a serious expression of an intent to cause a present or future harm”
• stating that Tinker “applies to school regulations directed at specific student viewpoints”
• interpreting Black to require only that the speaker knowingly made the statement, not subjectively intended it as a threat
• interpreting Black to require only that the speaker knowingly made the statement, not subjectively intended it as a threat

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).