Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Ninth Circuit· 9/15/1993

United States v. Angulo

Citations

  • 4 F.3d 843
  • 1993 WL 347410

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the jurors’ perception of an anonymous phone call was the relevant consideration rather than the actual intent of the caller
  • stating that a court can consider “the content of the allegations, the seriousness of the alleged misconduct or bias, and the credibility of the source” in determining if the defendant has met his or her burden
  • reaffirming Remmer presumption of prejudice in case where juror received threatening phone call
  • reaffirming Remmer presumption of prejudice in case where juror received threatening phone call
  • court may rebut presumption of prejudice by holding a hearing to examine the effect of threat on the remaining jurors
  • “An evidentiary hearing is not mandated every time there is an allegation of jury misconduct or bias. . . . the court must consider the content of the allegations, the seriousness of the alleged misconduct or bias, and the credibility of the source.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hug, Lay, Schroeder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Angulo

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.