Ninth Circuit· 6/19/2013

Graham S Henry v. Charles Ryan

Citations

720 F.3d 1073
2013 WL 3027404
2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 12525

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that “historical alcoholism might [be] considered aggravating as well as mitigating, depending on the perspective of the sentencing court”
recognizing that “historical alcoholism might [be] considered aggravating as well as mitigating, depending on the perspective of the sentencing court”
finding that petitioner’s conclusory 3 assertion that any testimony inconsistent with the truth must be not only inaccurate but also 4 perjured, does not constitute evidence sufficient to make out a Napue claim
applying Rule 32.1(e) 11 criteria to determine if an avenue for relief existed for purposes of exhausting Henry’s new 12 evidence supporting his Brady claim
affirming the denial of an evidentiary hearing when petitioner failed to “point to any additional evidence that could be properly pursued at an evidentiary hearing to” support his claim
no cause established when petitioner suspected and had evidentiary support for his Brady claim prior to federal habeas proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fisher, Tallman, Callahan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

59 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Graham S Henry v. Charles Ryan

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.