Skip to main content
· 3/4/1998

United States v. Anderton

Citations

  • 136 F.3d 747
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 3709
  • 1998 WL 90880

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing competing expert testimony presented at trial regarding age of children in a video
  • sua sponte re- manding with directions to correct the judgment, where it cited the wrong statute
  • sua sponte remanding with directions to correct the judgment, where it cited the wrong statute
  • remanding to district court when judgment eited incorrect statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Dubina, Hull, Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.