Skip to main content
· 10/31/2001

United States v. Oleg Zlatogur

Citations

  • 271 F.3d 1025
  • 2001 WL 1337609

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court properly considered hearsay evidence at sentencing where both parties had an opportunity to submit arguments to the court before ruling
  • holding the district court properly considered hearsay at sentencing where both parties had an opportunity to submit arguments to the court before ruling
  • determining that hearsay declarations were sufficiently reliable because the dis- trict court found the testifying witness relating the declarations credible, and other evidence corroborated the testimony
  • observing that a district court may consider “reliable hearsay” during sentencing
  • observing that a district court may consider “reliable hearsay” during sentencing
  • observing that a district court may consider “reliable hearsay” during sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carnes, Marcus, Per Curiam, Wilson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.