· 10/7/2003
United States v. Huckley Armstrong, A.K.A. Shorty
Citations
- 347 F.3d 905
- 2003 WL 22290401
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “amendments claimed in § 3582(c)(2) motions may be retroactively applied solely where expressly listed under § 1B1.10(c)”
- noting that a Sentencing Guidelines amendment may be applied retroactively only when it is expressly listed in § 1B1.10(c)
- stating only retroactively applicable amendments “that have the effect of lowering the sentencing range upon which a sentence was based, may be considered for reduction of a sentence under § 3582(c)(2)”
- “[0]nly amendments, clarifying or not, listed under subsection (c
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Birch, Barkett, Hill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.