United States v. Alex E. Womack, Eastern Division

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding district court did not clearly err in crediting government witnesses over defendant’s witnesses at evidentiary hearing on newly discovered evidence
• holding the fact that no other co-conspirators are named in an indictment “does not preclude a finding of a conspiracy”
• admission of evidence pursuant to the “co-conspirator hearsay” exception is reviewed for abuse of discretion
• “A credibility determination by the district court is ‘virtually unreviewable on appeal’ ”
• “A credibility determination by the district court is ‘virtually unreviewable on appeal.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).