United States v. Juan A. Benavidez-Benavidez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the district court may exclude polygraph evidence as unduly prejudicial under Fed. R. Evid. 403
• explaining that a district court “will rarely abuse its discretion by refusing to admit the [polygraph] evidence, even for a limited purpose and under limited conditions”
• ex-plaining how the Daubert Court set out factors to be reviewed when applying Rule 702
• district court may exclude polygraph evidence as unduly prejudicial under Rule 403
• polygraph excluded as unduly prejudicial under 17 Rule 403

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).