Carmelita Elcock v. Kmart Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the exclusion of an expert opinion that ignored the “real world” facts
• reversing admission of expert testimony when witness used an untested “novel synthesis” of two accepted methods that allowed him to “offer a subjective judgment . . . in the guise of a reliable expert opinion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).