Third Circuit· 7/14/2009
United States v. 5 Unlabeled Boxes
Citations
- 572 F.3d 169
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 15466
- 2009 WL 2020775
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- The Third Circuit “has previously noted that ‘the preferred usage’ of the term res judicata ‘encompasses both claim and issue preclusion.’” (quoting Venuto v. Witco Corp., 117 F.3d 754, 758 n.5 (3d Cir. 1997))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rendell, Smith, Pollak
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bush v. City of Philadelphia Philadelphia Police DepartmentE.D. Pennsylvania· 2010-02-04· cited 30×
- Timothy Defoe v. Lenroy PhillipThird Circuit· 2012-12-21· cited 23×
- Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Motorola Mobility LLCFederal Circuit· 2022-11-04· cited 14×
- Canonsburg General Hospital v. SebeliusDistrict of Columbia· 2013-10-17· cited 12×
- Bamgbose v. Delta-T Group, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2010-06-30· cited 10×
- Simpson v. Phila. Sheriff's OfficeE.D. Pennsylvania· 2019-01-07· cited 7×
- Perez v. KwasnyE.D. Pennsylvania· 2016-02-09· cited 6×
- United States v. Charles WeissThird Circuit· 2022-11-02· cited 4×
- Black, Davis & Shue Agency, Inc. v. Frontier Insurance Co. in Rehabilitation (In re Black, Davis, & Shue Agency, Inc.)M.D. Pennsylvania· 2012-02-02· cited 4×
- Pittsburgh Metro Area Postal Workers Union v. United States Postal ServiceW.D. Pennsylvania· 2013-04-02· cited 4×
- Russo v. City of PhiladelphiaE.D. Pennsylvania· 2011-05-11· cited 2×
- Lillis v. BartonBerks County Court of Common Pleas· 2011-04-19
- S. Freedman & Co. v. RaabThird Circuit· 2009-11-23
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. MendozaSupreme Court· 1984-01-10· cited 957×
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 2000-06-19· cited 633×
- Jean Alexander Cosmetics, Inc. v. L'OreaL Usa, Inc. Redkin 5th Avenue, N.Y.CThird Circuit· 2006-08-14· cited 239×
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. United States Steel CorporationThird Circuit· 1990-12-14· cited 137×
- George W. Henglein v. Colt Industries Operating CorporationThird Circuit· 2001-08-10· cited 120×
- David J. BECHTOLD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, Defendant-AppelleeEighth Circuit· 1997-01-15· cited 116×
- Holland, Michael H. v. Barnhart, Jo Anne B.D.C. Circuit· 2002-11-08· cited 73×
- Ralph Venuto v. Witco CorporationThird Circuit· 1997-06-30· cited 61×
- Nutraceutical Corp. v. Von EschenbachTenth Circuit· 2006-08-17· cited 26×
- Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. CrawfordEleventh Circuit· 2008-10-07· cited 5×
- Nutraceutical Corp. v. CrawfordD. Utah· 2005-04-13· cited 5×
- NUTRACEUTICAL CORPORATION v. Von EschenbachSupreme Court· 2007-05-14· cited 2×
- Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. CrawfordN.D. Georgia· 2007-08-15· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.