Holland, Michael H. v. Barnhart, Jo Anne B.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting agency’s contention that acquiescing nationwide to an interpretation compelled by court order “cannot violate that ‘not in accordance with law standard of the APA’”
• rejecting agency’s contention that acquiescing nationwide to an interpretation compelled by court order “cannot violate that ‘not in accordance with law standard of the APA’”
• “Allowing one circuit’s statutory interpretation to foreclose APA review of the question in another circuit would squelch the circuit disagreements that can lead to Supreme Court review.”
• refusing to choose among several potential validating grounds because “Chevron deference is only appropriate where the agency’s action represents its reasoned judgment about the meaning of the statute.’’
• refusing to choose among several potential validating grounds because “Chevron deference is only appropriate where the agency’s action represents its reasoned judgment about the meaning of the statute.’’
• refusing to choose among several potential validating grounds because ‘‘Chevron def- erence is only appropriate where the agency’s action represents its reasoned judgment about the meaning of the statute.’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).