Ralph Venuto v. Witco Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on section 26 in analyzing federal law of claim preclusion
• “[A] court’s decision to exclude a claim ‘without prejudice’ preserves the claim for a second action.”
• “Collateral estoppel customarily refers to issue preclusion, while res judicata, when used narrowly, refers to claim preclusion. This court has previously noted that ‘the preferred usage’ of the term res judicata ‘encompasses both claim and issue preclusion.’”
• “Collateral estoppel customarily refers to issue preclusion, while res judicata, when used narrowly, refers to claim preclusion. This court has previously noted that ‘the preferred usage’ of the term res judicata ‘encompasses both claim and issue preclusion.’”
• “Collateral estoppel customarily refers to issue preclusion, while res judicata, when used narrowly, refers to claim preclusion. This court has previously noted that ‘the preferred usage’ of the term res judicata ‘encompasses both claim and issue preclusion.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).