Skip to main content
· 7/26/2002

Unger v. FFW CORP.

Citations

  • 771 N.E.2d 1240
  • 2002 Ind. App. LEXIS 1196
  • 2002 WL 1729818

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a noncompetition clause, which restricted the employee from “participating in any ‘business competitive with the business of [his former employer]’ ” was reasonably limited in the type of activity it prohibited
  • protectible interest found when disgruntled former em- ployee harmed goodwill by using employer’s confidential 10 No. 02-3441 customer list

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Kirsch, Mathias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.