Titus v. Rheitone, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the covenant was not wider than necessary to protect [employer’s] legitimate interest, even though the “restrictions ma[d]e it difficult for [employee] to remain in prepress field.”
• holding broad scope of activity covered by noncompetition reasonable because the employee “knowingly executed the employment agreement” and was “handsomely compensated” as an employee of the company
• upholding covenant not to compete of employer in pre-press industry that prohibited employee from working in any capacity with “the businesses of the Employer,” noting the “extremely competitive” nature and “highly competitive pace” of the industry
• confidential customer informa- tion protectible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).