Felsher v. University of Evansville

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an argument was waived because it was raised for the first time in the reply brief
• concluding that issue raised for first time in reply brief was waived
• noting that appellants are not permitted to present new arguments in their reply briefs, and any argument an appellant fails to adequately raise in their initial brief is waived for appeal
• stating Indiana courts do not recognize public disclosure of private facts as a cause of action
• “Registration of the trademark with the office of the Secretary of State provides the registrant a remedy against the infringement of the registered trademark.”
• discussing Lanham Act claims against cybersquatters and cyber copycats

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).