Skip to main content
Third Circuit· 7/10/1992

Umbenhauer v. Woog

Citations

  • 969 F.2d 25
  • 1992 WL 158257

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that order of dismissal without prejudice was appealable where counsel informed court of appeals at oral argument that statute of limitations had run
  • explaining that district courts possess “broad discretion to either dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint for failure to effect service or to simply quash service of process”
  • explaining that district courts possess “broad discretion to either dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint for failure to effect service or to simply quash service of process”
  • “[D]istrict courts possess broad discretion to either dismiss the plaintiffs complaint for failure to effect service or to simply quash service of process.”
  • “[D]istrict courts possess broad discretion to either dismiss the plaintiff's complaint for failure to effect service or to simply quash service of process.”
  • “[D]istrict courts possess broad discretion to either dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint for failure to effect service or to simply quash service of process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Becker, Cowen, Garth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Umbenhauer v. Woog

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.