Humana, Inc., D/B/A Humana Hospital San Antonio, Plaintiff-Counter v. Avram A. Jacobson, M.D., P.A., Defendant-Counter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Morse court's analysis to conclude that a subsequent mail service in accordance with state law was valid despite plaintiff's initial reliance on federal mail service
• applying Morse court’s analysis to conclude that a subsequent mail service in accordance with state law was valid despite plaintiffs initial reliance on federal mail service
• requiring a plaintiff seeking a preliminary injunction to show “that money damages would not fully repair the harm”
• Congress did not intend to \create unfairness for plaintiffs by eliminating an otherwise permissible method of service\
• ”[t]he congressional action, designed to ensure fair treatment of defendants, indicates no intention to create unfairness for plaintiffs”
• “[T]he amount of security required is a matter for the discretion of the trial court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).