Uliasz v. Gillette

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• which held, however, that the recording of the plan and subsequent conveyance of lots referencing the plan were not in themselves enough to prove an intent to dedicate
• no reasonable necessity where plaintiffs had alternative access to and egress from public way

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).