Lowe v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Gorham v. Luckett . . . decided that the power of removal . . . when conferred upon a court, was a judicial and not an executive power”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Adams v. Rubinow
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1968-11-20· cited 156×
• Meagher v. Driscoll
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1868-03-15· cited 85×
• New England Box Co. v. C & R Construction Co.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1943-05-03· cited 71×
• Uliasz v. Gillette
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1970-03-03· cited 31×
• Bristol Hydraulic Co. v. Boyer
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1879-11-15· cited 27×
• Holliday v. Fields, Governor
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1925-07-14· cited 22×
• Commonwealth v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1880-10-08· cited 20×
• Brown v. Grover
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1869-10-09· cited 20×
• State ex rel. Green v. Collison
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1938-02-16· cited 16×
• Miller v. Davis
  E.D. Kentucky· 2017-07-21· cited 16×
• Makepeace Bros. v. Town of Barnstable
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1935-11-26· cited 15×
• Speer v. Wood
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1917-03-26· cited 14×
• Patchen v. Keeley
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1887-04-15· cited 13×
• Schuff v. Pflanz
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1896-04-02· cited 11×
• Rotch's Wharf Co. v. Judd
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1871-10-15· cited 9×
• Hunt Drug Co. v. Hubert
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1937-09-16· cited 9×
• Darling v. Kelly
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1873-09-15· cited 8×
• Sanford v. Vinal
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1990-04-13· cited 6×
• State Ex Rel. Murray v. Bozarth
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1934-02-13· cited 5×
• Nickerson v. Thacher
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1888-05-04· cited 5×