· 3/20/1992
Tattan v. Kurlan
Citations
- 588 N.E.2d 699
- 32 Mass. App. Ct. 239
- 1992 Mass. App. LEXIS 277
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- construing derelict fee statute as incorporating common-law principle of presumed intent
- even if plans were read into the deeds, the phrase “reserved” for “future street purposes” does not express an intent to reserve a fee interest
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Perretta, Porada, Laurence
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.