Skip to main content
· 3/20/1992

Tattan v. Kurlan

Citations

  • 588 N.E.2d 699
  • 32 Mass. App. Ct. 239
  • 1992 Mass. App. LEXIS 277

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • construing derelict fee statute as incorporating common-law principle of presumed intent
  • even if plans were read into the deeds, the phrase “reserved” for “future street purposes” does not express an intent to reserve a fee interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Perretta, Porada, Laurence

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.